The Quooker 31.234.00 FLEX hose is the pull-out hose for your Quooker Flex tap. The hose is black with a nylon sleeve and has a thickness of 16mm, while the black plastic head has a thickness of 24mm. The total length of the hose is 110cm.
In the middle of the hose is a steel strip. This is the detection element that lets the tap recognise when boiling water is requested. On delivery, the brass end piece contains a plastic tip. You remove this after installation, so you can fit the hose into the flex coupling piece.
Please note: this hose is not suitable for Quooker Flex taps manufactured after 1 January 2026. This includes all Flex Square taps.
The hose has a length of 110cm and a thickness of 16mm. The black plastic head at the end has a thickness of 24mm. The hose is black with a nylon sleeve for extra protection.
No, this hose is not suitable for Quooker Flex taps manufactured after 1 January 2026. This includes all Flex Square taps. Always check your tap's model first before ordering.
In the middle of the hose is a steel strip. This strip provides the detection that lets the tap recognise when boiling water is requested, so the correct water temperature is delivered.
On delivery, the brass end piece contains a plastic tip. You remove this tip after installation, so the hose fits properly into the flex coupling piece. Without this step, the hose won't fit correctly.
Yes, the Quooker 31.234.00 FLEX hose comes with a plastic key included. With this key you can easily remove the old hose from the coupling piece, so you can fit the new hose yourself.
This hose fits onto the Quooker coupling piece for Flex taps, item number 31.227.00. You can also find this coupling piece separately in our range if you need it individually for your installation.
View all reviews from our customers below
Helemaal top, snelle levering.
Prima slang. Snel te vervangen. Snel geleverd
Gutes Proddukt, passte perfekt. Schnelle Lieferung, alles Bestens.
Prima product en snel geleverd.
You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.
What do you think of the article?