Description

Twin-handle 2-hole kitchen faucet


also for


Doeco Windsor MK99C (chrome) shiny
Doeco Windsor MK99I (stainless steel) matte color
Doeco Windsor MK99BS (bronze)


CAUTION


there are different parts for the old or new model.
long shaft where the knob sits on or a short shaft where the knob sits on.
Should be checked by removing the knob from the faucet.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a cartridge with a long spindle and a cartridge with a short spindle, and which type do I need for the Doeco Windsor MK99 tap?

For the Doeco Windsor MK99 tap, two types of cartridges are available: one with a long spindle and one with a short spindle. The difference lies in the length of the spindle that fits into the tap. To determine which type you need, remove the existing cartridge from the tap and compare it with the available options. For both the hot and cold water side, you can order the same type of cartridge, provided the spindles are identical. If the tap is dripping from the spout, the cartridges are worn and need to be replaced.

Which cartridge do I need for an old model Doeco Windsor MK99 tap (manufactured before September 2011)?

For an old model Doeco Windsor MK99 tap (up to 09-2011, with the longer spindle), you need the cartridge with the long spindle. This part can be found on the Doeco Windsor MK99 parts page. The specific item is the Doeco MKOEXBWR cartridge with long spindle.

Specifications

Type kraan
keukenkraan
Kraan perlator
Nee
Kraangat
2-gats
Kraanbediening
tweegreepskraan
Doeco serie
Windsor

Doeco Windsor MK99 parts

Two-handle 2-hole kitchen faucet also tbv Doeco Windsor MK99C (chrome) shinyDoeco Windsor MK99I (stainless steel) matte colorDoeco Windsor MK99BS (bronze) CAUTION there are different onderd

Doeco Windsor MK99 onderdelen

Bijpassende onderdelen

Do you have a question about this product?

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Please contact us

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Add review

What do you think of the article?

5,0